One issue that has always intrigued me, never understand one iota, is the clash between Islam and the West, an issue that brings with it problems such as the (so-called) war on terrorism, the Israeli-Palestinian the wars in Iraq, Afghanistan, Iran, etc. ...
The media reported continuing reports of Islamic terrorists who are caught by our highly efficient police foil terrorist attacks as if nothing had happened. Muslims who kill themselves just to make war on the infidels, sacrificing himself, only to be able to have sex with dozens of virgins after death. I mean, crazy.
When there was the invasion of Iraq, the TV showed us pictures of jubilant Muslims burning the American flag.
And then there is this blessed on September 11. From a cave in Afghanistan, Bin Laden, by hatred in America, he organized an attack on the Twin Towers, no one knows why. It 'a terrorist, hates America, this is the explanation. Then there
Oriana Fallaci, who with his "Anger and pride" he described an Arab world intolerant of women, backward, made up of Arabs who conquered the West with "the bellies of our women."
And Paul Barnard who wrote the book "Why do they hate us" explaining why Muslim hatred toward the West.
Then there is the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, with Israelis claiming their right to land, and give the murderers of the Palestinians, for their part, while the Palestinians say the Israelis are murderers, such as not respecting the limits imposed by the UN have arbitrarily decided to take a slice of territory in more.
accounts that do not add up.
is one of the paintings, to think well, no returns. Where it is clear that we were told a bunch of bullshit.
Let's see what does not come back.
First. Do not back that all Muslims hate us. Just go around the city, and meet with Muslim, always kind, considerate, quiet.
Hatred is in the words of Bush, Borghezio, Bossi, of the Italians. But you rarely hear about intolerance to the contrary.
Then, if you are a good reflection, it is not clear why this hatred toward Muslims and not to the Chinese.
It 's true that the Chinese are a people quiet and calm, but it is also equally true that the Chinese are destroying our economy by invading of low cost, using a workforce that lives in poorly paid and sometimes inhumane conditions in our area. In contrast, Islamic
open craft shops Arabic, kebabs, pizza, paying taxes and also providing alternatives to our products in general, and not directly competitive.
In other words, the feeling is that the media push the accelerator creating an Islamic threat does not exist, and neglecting the Chinese, which is very hidden, but for this most dangerous and insidious than Islamic. I remained
given a document that anyone can find on the internet, is the appeal of Freemasonry to the Sicilian American Freemasonry, a cry that sounds almost desperate request for help unheeded, which warns against the danger of China, not the Islamic
http : / / www.granloggiadisicilia.org / documents / Solstice 20d'Inverno%% 202007.htm
This is an important document for certain, the source comes from, particularly reliable, and content.
It is also clear that September 11 was an obvious excuse to attack a country that had nothing to do with terrorism, namely Iraq, and that the problem of Afghanistan is a fabrication, it is clear to all that America does not give anything to dismantle the dictatorship and flying kites in Kabul, but only want to impose their authority.
On the other hand, if Iraq was a rogue state because Saddam had massacred Shiites do not remember how, one might also ask why China is not listed, since it is a totalitarian regime that has often made a bloodbath (remember Tiananmen, or the Tibetan people, to give just two examples).
But the most glaring mockery, obvious to anyone with more than one neuron in the brain, is that the war on terrorism.
In summary, according to the bizarre reconstruction of official sources, since the September 11 was caused by Islamic terrorists, has made the war on Iraq and Afghanistan. The explanation is madness, because terrorism is a phenomenon internal to individual countries, and it is clear that attacking the Middle Eastern countries the hatred between civilizations increases, rather than decreasing, and terrorism can only increase.
Not to mention that the war in Iraq has claimed more than a million deaths, in time now, and it would take hundreds of events like September 11 to make a blood bath of equal magnitude.
The brilliant move to declare war on Iraq has been more or less intelligent, as if to solve the problem of the monster of Florence, had thrown a bomb over the city.
The other colossal lie about that for years I did not understand one iota is the question of Israel, where it is not clear if it came first the chicken or the egg, whether it is true that the Palestinians deny Israel's right to have a country, or whether it is true that the Israelis committed unspeakable atrocities in detriment of the Palestinians. For
get to the bottom of the matter it turns out that both are right, and that the real problem is that someone in that area, wanted to create an outbreak of permanent war, wanting to (rightly) to give a home to a people persecuted over the centuries terribly , but it also surgically implanted State (to Israel), in Palestinian areas, without consulting the Palestinians.
Another thing that comes back is not the religious issue. We spread the notion that Muslims are intolerant and want to subdue the entire West, but anyone with a minimum of familiarity with world religions understand that this is false for three reasons.
First. Why Islam as a religion has the same strain of the Jewish and Muslim and also recognize the figures of Jesus and Mary (although, of course, the Islamic Jesus is only a prophet and not the son of God pin the entire Christian religion). Moreover, they also recognize the Gospel and the Torah books as divinely inspired and is hard to imagine that a religion which recognizes Christ as a prophet is by force of circumstances, all inevitably violent and intolerant. According
. Although some passages in the Talmud prescribes not to kill the Jews and subjugate the world to Judaism. Moreover, Catholicism also brings with it a doctrine that, if misunderstood, is suitable for the purpose of violence and abuse, and not coincidentally in the name of Catholicism have committed massacres of entire populations to fade from the memory of the Holocaust; In fact, the Catholic is generally believed to be the sole repository of truth, and then in the name of this conviction that we are often in the past made war on the heretics, and in the name of this belief (though not specifically mentioned) that you bless the soldiers departing for the front to massacre innocent people are not Catholic, and is always in the name of this belief that allows Bush said that "God wants the Iraq war."
So who the religion, one way or other, chewing time, and has experienced intolerance of Catholics and Buddhists, atheists who, one suspects that Islamic fundamentalism is a colossal dance.
In other words, the suspicion is true, there are some lunatics who are killed while making war on the infidels. But that does not mean all Muslims are like that.
It must also be recognized that the Freemasons, which over the centuries has been able to implement the project European Union and the UN, is its basis in Jewish culture, but this does not mean that all Jews want to dominate other peoples, and above all does not mean that this is the message contained in the Bible and sacred texts of Judaism.
The truth is that the sacred texts of the three monotheistic world religions, Christianity, Judaism and Islam, contain within itself contradictory ideas or phrases that can be misinterpreted, but a misinterpretation by some extremist fringe groups does not justify the condemnation entirely of whole peoples and of all religion.
Above all, as is clear to many that the message and doctrine of the Catholic Church is NOT the message of Christ, who was a message of peace and love overwhelmed by the Church hierarchy, probably the same is true for the Talmudic doctrine of the supremacy of the people Jewish, Islamic and which refers to holy war.
So the question, to quote Paul Barnard, is not "why they hate us." The right question, the piece that is missing, is: who has an interest in destroying Islam, and why?
The missing piece. The problem of Islamic finance.
The possible answer came to me while scrolling a few pages of the Digest, I jumped in the eyes the "Islamic finance". Intrigued by the fact that in a Western legal text there is an article on Islamic finance, I started reading.
We see the main points of which are Islamic finance. And see if maybe this is not the core of the problem of relations between the West and Islam.
cornerstones of the financial system are:
- Prohibition of loans at interest. We explain that this means that relapse and its implications for the banking system.
1) if a bank lends money to a company, it does buy in exchange for a small share of it, thus also participate in the profits and losses. This means, in respect our banks, less risk.
2) If an individual wants to buy a house, the bank buys the house, and then transfer it to private, will pay a monthly fee as an installment purchase, and will be redeemed at the end. If the individual fails to pay, the bank takes the house, and the private is as if he had paid a rent. But you avoid all the nonsense of our system, in which an outstanding debt to lose the feathers are often both banks and individuals, with our absurd system of the case.
In other words, the Islamic banking system makes it the private bank is much less likely, and both are concerned the deal.
- Prohibition of speculative financial instruments with Financial risky. In a word, are prohibited in the Islamic world of derivatives, bonds, and all those products that have caused the Western financial crisis, and that will cause the collapse of our economy, handed over to the Chinese.
In other words, Islamic finance is based on principles opposed to those on which our finance. The same newspaper Il Sole 24 ore "admits that Islamic finance does not run the risk of being" overwhelmed by debt. "
The system has also not indifferent to the secondary benefits, such as the easy tracking of capital, which limits the ability to commit acts which are obviously illegal.
E 'also obvious, The system guarantees against the abuse of Islamic banks, in other words we often happens that when a bank wants to cause the economic ruin of a subject, ask for the return of capital provided by closing access to credit and arbitrarily blocking the accounts of the debtor, with Islamic finance this is virtually impossible because the debtor is also a "partner" in the bank's business, and therefore the bank could not ruin the debtor unless ruin himself.
Now, as you know some parties of the extreme left and extreme right, which included the problem of the central banks of the points of their program, our financial system is the key to understanding how goes the world. Wars, financial crisis, European Union, problems are bound by one common denominator, namely the problem of ownership of central banks and the money issue (issue left in the hands of private banks, rather than states, with all the necessary consequences ).
Also remember that international finance is largely in the hands of a few Jewish families, above all Rothschild and Rockefeller.
the contrary, in Islamic states, money is beaten by the State itself, as central banks in the hands of the state.
It 'possible that the real problem at the root of the Arab-Israeli Racial hatred is derived from religious issues.
The real problem is financial rather than, as if the principles of Islamic finance gain a foothold in our country, would resolve many of the problems faced by European countries, starting from the house. On the contrary, would be taken away the very pillars that allowed the current financial crisis, and the power is currently devoid of those tools that have led to the demolition political, economic, and judicial, Italy today.
why our media continue to propose stories Imam terrorists, bombs averted, of rogue regimes, but does not touch on the problem of Islamic banks; because addressing the problem of Islamic finance means addressing the problem of our finances.
And that is why we have seen Islamic butcher, Islamic shops, mosques, but no bank, while the few banks offering Islamic financial instruments in reality merely offer sources of funds disguised as Italian Islamic products. To open a bank in Italy it would take the green light of Freemasonry, but that probably will not ever because it is too dangerous for us, as if he were allowed to Italians to enter the Islamic banking system, it is likely that these banks would have a boom at the expense of ours. It's all part
from there. The Italian problem, the financial crisis, the housing shortage, the Mafia, immigration ... all goes from there.
not the mafia or terrorists or bad Muslims. But Draghi, the ECB, the Treaty of Lisbon, Intesa-Sanpaolo, by politicians. I want to like the mafia, terrorists want, they want Muslims bad, so you do not understand that the real problem to them.
Postscript.
wrote this article I went looking for others who have expressed my idea, that the conflict with Islam was born in the table for financial reasons, not religious. I quote here the part of an interview with Nicole Forcheri Marco Saba.
If I understand correctly, THE QUESTION MONETARY INFLUENCE diplomatic relations and the choices geopolitics?
Yes, we must remember that at this moment we are witnessing a clash TECTONICS BETWEEN THE ECONOMIC PLATFORM-WEST AND THE ISLAMIC BANKING, WHILE CHINA IS THE WINDOW TO LOOK AND PROBABLY Clear the field, to be born there next EMPIRE BANK ECONOMIC . FROM THIS POINT OF VIEW, ITS NATURAL PARTNER WILL RUSSIA AND SOUTH AMERICA.
WHAT IS THE COLLISION TECTONICS?
is officially a religious clash between Islam and the West, but IN REALITY IS CONCERNED WITH THE MONEY MARKET AND DESIGN TO THE BANK. Basically, the Western banking system appropriates IS THE CAPITAL OF INTEREST WHILE THE BANK IS ISLAM appropriates only the capital, since interest is prohibited by Shari'a. ALSO A REVOLUTIONARY CONCEPT THAT IS BOTH IN EUROPE AS TO INCOME OF CITIZENSHIP IS ALREADY IN FORCE FOR YEARS IN SOME ARAB COUNTRIES.
How important is the petrodollars IN THIS COLLISION?
Saddam Hussein was captured and killed WHY WAS STARTED TO SELL OIL IN EXCHANGE FOR EURO. IN REALITY petrodollars MEANS REQUIRED TO ACQUIRE THE OIL IN DOLLARS, IN PARTICULAR IN DEBT SECURITIES USA, artificially increase the DEMAND. THE SECURITIES HAVE trick of excess was overdriven and China is showing signs Of impatience, controlling its monetary policy is gaining SPHERES OF INFLUENCE IN COMPETITION WITH THE WEST.
can be summed up much vaunted THE COMPETITIVENESS OF CHINA LIES ONLY IN THIS?
YES, SAY SO MAIN. IN REALITY THIS IS THE REAL Taboo. IN FACT, it is in say the Chinese WESTERN ELITE I CAN DO LOW PRICES WHY WORK AS SLAVES, NOT TO REVEAL THE TRICK of monetary CHINESE LIVE ON BEHALF OF THE STATE. If we wanted
DO THE SAME THING THAT MAKES THE CHINA, WE WOULD BE ABLE TO MAKE A BETTER MODEL COMPETITION BECAUSE WE SURE, AT LEAST IN THEORY, THERE IS A CONTROL Democratic state. BUT WILL BE DIFFICULT IN ITALY, WITH THE ELITE OF PLAY THAT HAS A PERFECTLY FLAT CORAGGIOGRAMMA ... MORE
.
ARTICLE 24 HOURS OF SUN
HTTP: / / WWW.ILSOLE24ORE.COM/ART/SOLEONLINE4/FINANZA% 20E% 20MERCATI/2009/09/FINANZA-ISLAMICA-REGOLE.SHTML? UUID = 29A819F2-11de-A209-AEC8- 0A2DBE87142A
HTTP: / / WWWDATA.UNIBG.IT/DATI/BACHECA/270/27323.PDF
http://www.granloggiadisicilia.org/DOCUMENTI/SOLSTIZIO% 20D
http://archiviostorico.corriere.it / 2009/luglio/24/mille_miliardi_della_finanza_islamica_co_9_090724019.shtml
http://www.comedonchisciotte.org/site/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=4413
http://www.comedonchisciotte.org/site/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=5050
http://www.lafinanzaislamica.it/
0 comments:
Post a Comment